Pros and Cons on Reproductive Cloning

    Science has emerged in many ways that may have the power to promote or undermine human well-being. Advancements in technologies are profound and indeed, multiplying. One that struck my interest are varied issues and opinions relating to reproductive cloning. Reproductive  cloning is a type of cloning which is performed for the purpose of creating a duplicate copy of another organism. It is accomplished using a process called somatic cell nuclear transfer (Smith).  I chose this topic to help me relate myself to other individuals who are still in rage and very much against this innovation though I am not disregarding the fact that many others are patronizing the idea of it. A number of religious groups, ethical societies and moralists are still implying that this technology should not be legalized and performed. My goal in this paper is to cite issues on these people who are in favor and against this technology and to bring about a verdict to whether reproductive cloning should be advanced to mankind.

    Insights of people on reproductive cloning are still debatable. A great majority of people have intuitive sense that human beings should not be cloned. Some are hopeful that cloning is the only solution to their dilemmas. Many couples who are infertile resort to this technology and find it very helpful and satisfying. Also, lesbians and gay men can use this as a method of asexual reproduction, of course through a surrogate who will carry the pregnancy.  But research shows that cloning is accompanied by many risks.
 Clones appear to have shorter lifespan, leading to concerns about the disadvantages of     reproductive cloning. There is also the risk of losing genetic diversity as a result of using cloning, especially in the agricultural industry, where the temptation to use standardized animals is understandably tempting (Smith). 

Considering that, children who were a product of cloning may tend to live in the shadow of their nuclear donor and their psychological and social development may be seriously compromised though this can be evaded if we embrace them as part of human diversity and creativity.

    Some people still strongly disagree to reproductive cloning because of its infringements towards self-determination. According to different national and international documents human reproductive cloning possibly violates human dignity.

 Whose human dignity does (reproductive) cloning actually violate Three objects of violation are possible firstly, the clone, that is, the copy secondly, the cloned, that is, the original and, lastly, a more collective object of violation, which could roughly be paraphrased as the society or the legal community(Voneky  Wolfrum 78).

As technologies proliferated, reproductive cloning remained as one of the processes that individuals opt to choose. Arguments sporadically arise whether it is really a moral or an immoral act. In 1997, the NBAC issued its report on Cloning Human Beings. At this time it is morally unacceptable for anyone in the public or private sector, whether in a research or clinical setting, to attempt to create a child using somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning (Kass  Wilson xvi). In my assertion, I second this notion that cloning breaches the moral rights of the human cloned and being cloned so it should not anymore be negotiable in court thus, be banned.
    Presently, a law in Israel prohibiting the practice of cloning is passed. Though it wasnt permitted to be permanent, it was extended for seven more years. Israels government has a firm hold on this matter. The government asked for a five-year extension, but the committee decided to lengthen it to seven years... Sheetrit said cloning for the purpose of making new people was not ethical or moral, even if it became safe in the future (Siegel-Itzkovich). The time has come for states to adopt legislation restricting the practice of human cloning.

    Comparatively, in the story Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the character of Frankenstein, in his determination and pursuit to create another perfect human life, it turned into a monster which later killed his loved ones. He beheld those he loved spend vain sorrow upon the graves of William and Justine, the first hapless victims to his unhallowed arts (Shelley 73). The story is quite similar to cloning which is also directed in creating a new human. The story reflects bitterness of Mary Shelleys frustrated ambitions and her struggle to defeat people around her. It is somehow reflected in one of the letters included in her book. I have no friend, Margaret when I am glowing with the enthusiasm of success, there will be none to participate my joy if I am assailed by disappointment, no one will endeavour to sustain me in dejection (Shelley 4). I disagree with Mary Shelleys principle because her obsession can lead to selfishness and demoralization of others. Likewise, in human cloning, it may have arise because of peoples competitiveness and willingness to prove something not considering that it may have a double effect in which the effect would be a greater evil.

SOUTHERN CULTURE

Southern culture has been and still remains more socially conservative compared than the rest of the country. Due to the central role of natural setting and agriculture, society remained stratified according to land ownership. Communities inevitably have a stronger attachment to their neighbors and their churches as the primary community institution. Southerners lifestyles are often viewed as slower paced since in history they were being resistant to change especially on social and political issues. They are also described as polite and particularly welcoming to visitorsthis characteristic has been labeled Southern hospitality. American literature especially classics often explores and uses Southern culture as their main setting due to its natural landscape and rich history. Lee Smith, an American fiction author, typically incorporates Southeastern United States setting in her works of literature. Her latest novel, On Agate Hill, contains characters based upon historical people from the Burwell School, an early female boarding school located in Hillsborough, North Carolina. The novel basically is about the life of Molly Petree, a girl orphaned by the Civil War, living on her uncles plantation called Agate Hill located in North Carolina until her benefactor sent her to an all-womens college in Virginia. The novel offers a realistic picture about plantation life right after the Civil War, the educational experiences of Southern women and hardships and joys of living in the North Carolina Mountains.

The novel is multilayered and complex that tells the story of Molly Petree through diaries, letters, court documents, poems, ballads and narratives from different people, including Molly herself. Mollys diary begins on her 13th birthday in 1872 sharing her story during her stay at a ruined North Carolina plantation called Agate Hill, owned by her dying uncle.  Since the crumbling state is filled with the spirits of relatives, former slaves and Molly siblings and parents, she writes, I am like a ghost girl wafting through this ghost house seen by none. As the conditions of Civil War deteriorates, Mollys daily life requires her to witness gruesome montages of death, from a slave hanging from a tree to the dug-up bones of soldiers and from the destroyed houses with few remaining treasures to the horrible stories of abuses. Apparently the novel, through the diaries of Molly, vividly describes the aftermath of Civil Warits horrible consequences to the Southerners. Mollys initial entries in her diary illustrate the impact of the war on individuals and families in the South. Mollys belief in ghosts and spirits illustrates Southern strong attachment with old myths and stories that their ancestors shared to them. Indeed, death is a constant presence for Molly her father and brothers lost in the war, her mother, her relatives and the apparitions more real to her than the living.

Meanwhile, Maria Snow, Gateway Academy Headmistress, through her letters illustrates how Southern women during that time were being treated in the society. Maria Snow in the story once wrote, We lose our names as we lose our youth, our beauty and our lives (Smith 163). This statement says a lot about Mariahs life and women in general. When women get married, they give up their last name, almost symbolizing that their identity is almost gone. Once women have babies, they start to lose their youth because lifes stresses are taking place. Apparently marriage and childbearing for women were the start for them to fulfill their social constructed gender roles, which during those times were restricted to motherhood and domesticity. Mariah even writes

But now  NOW, how dare he call me the Headmistress yet refuse to allow me the right of participation in even such a basic decision as this one Truly I am his Servant, NOT his Partner, whether he owns it or not. Basically Dr. Snow does nothing but read, while I work my fingers to the bone, yet have Nothing to say on any topic, him determining all according to his whim though he understands nothing, I repeat NOTHING about the administration of this Academy or anything else (Smith 147).

This statement depicts the conservative view of Southern people towards women. Women were viewed only useful at home Mariah even expressed remorse and guilt feeling at having a girl child saying that I confess my sorrow at having a girl, for I know how she will struggle in this world (Smith 163). Apparently the novel illustrates womens position and limited opportunities, perceived to be lower compared to men.

In the story however, Mollys diary provides a place where she can fight, where she can vent her anger at treachery as well as her pleasure in nature and romance. Mollys diary is her means to develop voice, identity and selfhood. Molly writes as her way to survive. Some young women in the novel, due to their isolation and the belittlement they experience from others because of their helplessness as children or just as women, writes in order to create their own self. The will to claim the right to articulate feelings and a sense of self through voice are express through their writings.

    The novel also illustrates traditional courtship and country womens idea of a fairy tale. As a normal young girl who grew up in natural setting with a lot of daydreaming, Molly is also romantic with her impressive awareness in classic romantic novels. She describes tableau vivant where flares burned in sconces. There lay Romeo dead on his back, the vial of poison still in his hand. Fair Juliet, also dead, lay in a pool of crimson created by the skirt of her silk dress (Smith 19). Her romantic inclination hinges on a scene in which Molly is captivated by the appearance of a banjo playing mountain man with a yellow-red hair that fell forward into his eyes and a big nose and wide crooked reckless grin. The rapturous love story is presented in a traditional way that even features a woeful ballad, Molly and the Travelling Man.

    In terms of education setting, south is associated with farming communities. The setting is wide and nature oriented. The school buildings were often established during early times. Its wide grounds and old style buildings provide easy access to a wealth of cultural, historic and recreational activities.  Due to wide spaces teachers are more motivated to let the students enhance their physical talents and skills. Since schools are often set on a rural campus in an area of open spaces, woods, winding Their simple setting however with their simple lifestyle make them focus more on their academic achievement. The diaries and narratives of some Southern students and teachers in the novel contains a lot of description towards the ruins of Civil war yet provides vivid portrayal of the Southern rich natural environment. 

    Apparently the novel illustrates not only the conservative lifestyle of the South together with their natural setting but the novel also depicts the plight of women in the South by which the society perceive them as inferior. The writer develops the story through the observations of her characters. Apparently the novel On Agate Hill is recommended to anyone interested in the lives of a vanished era. So many things that are significant about that time and place that are revealed by which the contemporary readers can learn about.

Night by Elie Wiesel

Night is a book inspired by the real experience of Elie Wiesel during World War II. It is the first part of the three books (Night, Dawn and Day) where it reflects the psychological impacts during and after the Holocaust to the author. The word Night is a progression from darkness to light where it is based on the Jewish tradition of starting the new day by night.

    The story is strongly influenced by the characters that are associated with the narrator (Elie Wiesel). Mosche the beadle, his friend and spiritual guide who told him Man raises himself toward God by the questions he asks Him. Rabbi Eliahou, a person that spoke the words that enlightened his connection with his father during the death march always near each other, for suffering, for blows, for the ration of bread, for prayer. The French girl who always helps him, she always reminds him to put away his anger. Meir Katz, the person who helped Elie during the night when he is choked.

    The place where Elie and his father suffered the most is at Buchenwald because it is the place where they became separated. Elie also felt a very deep anger to himself where he could not even lift a finger to help his father who called out for his name. His conscience engulfed him and at the same time, the suffering of his father hurt him the most.

    In the camp, lessons were taught in a very cruel way. For example the hanging of the boy, it teaches them that stealing will cost their life. The author included this in his book to show that even a little boy is not exempted in death.

    The French girl in the story is a worker next to the warehouse where Elie works at Buna. After a year, Elie met again this girl in Paris where they reminisced what they have experienced in the past.

    On January 25, 1945, Elies father passed away. He found about this when he saw another man situated in his fathers place. Elie felt a deep pain for the lost because his name was the last word he heard of him. Although suffering from the death of his father, he also felt a bit of freedom.

    Elie described himself after the war like a body half dead by starvation. He knew this by the appearance of his body, skin and bones.
People and the nomads, the Magistrate feels that the codes underlying the settlers relation to the indigenous peoples have been compromised, leading him to question his own identity in relation to the Empire and the settlement. While he cannot identify fully with the barbarians, beaten and made to confess to lies based on the cruelties of Joll, the Magistrate is equally unable to identify either the reasoning nor devaluation of humanity at the base of this abuse. In his physical separation from the Empire, the Magistrate has been able to retain some of his own humanity. He cannot fully abstract the natives in the manner in which Joll is able, the Magistrate is incapable of what  Robert Spencer identifies as the ability to  reinforce a system of beliefs that by defining a group of people as less that human seeks to legitimize their torture  (175). Though he is unable to identify with the indigenous groups of the area, the Magistrate cannot ignore their very real humanity, nor his role in the torture at the hands of the Empire. The settlers are an extension of the invasion of imperialism but it is a peaceful inhabitation that has only underlying manifestations of tension. The settlers do not, on their own, generally seek to move beyond the walls of the settlement. They simply, like the Magistrate, wish to be left alone. Joll and the renewed interest of the Empire in this small outpost causes the Magistrate great unease as he knows that the expansion envisioned will inevitably represent a surge in tension and violence. He is intent on avoiding conflict, noting,  I believe in peace, perhaps even peace at any price  (Coetzee 14), as his life becomes more centered around evading the meddling hand of the Empire.

    The Magistrates understanding of the indigenous culture and archaeological hobby create in him a knowledge that is basis for sympathy and his later identification of the defects inherent to the mindset of the Empire. Having lived the majority of his life at the settlement, he has learned much through observation and in his interactive role as magistrate. In particular, his interest as an amateur archaeologist says much about his later attempt at emotionally excavating the layers of trauma and emotion that define the barbarian woman. The ruins in the dunes represent a hobby for him and are yet another way for him to connect with the area and carve out his own place within its history by trying to establish a linear time line to locate himself within. There is a feeling that the settlement exists outside of history, not simply for the effect of ambiguity employed by Coetzee to remove the historical context of this particular chapter of imperialism, but also to illustrate the isolation of such outposts and the settlers  feelings of disconnectedness from the realities of the larger world. The physical setting of the narrative, and in particular the use of it in the archaeological dig, also highlight the mood of existing outside of established history. The sands of the desert represent the sands of time, acting as an effective cover for the past which becomes more deeply buried with the encroachment of the Empire and the slow extinction those who could once have carried the lost civilizations story,  the dunes cover the ruins of houses that date back to times long before the western provinces were annexed and the fort was built  (Coetzee 14).

    The Magistrate is an anomaly in his, however casual and recreational, interest in the lost civilization with no record of its existence. However, in his imagining of their history, there is a sense of fear and feeling of eventuality that his own small cultures fate will be the same,
Perhaps in bygone days criminals, slaves, soldiers trekked the twelves miles to the river, and cut down the poplar trees ... transported the timbers back to this barren place in carts and built houses, and a fort too, for all I know, and in the course of time died, so that their masters, their prefects and magistrates and captains, could climb the roofs and towers morning  and evening to scan the world from horizon to horizon for signs of the barbarians (Coetzee 15).

The Magistrate and the entire settlement are simply continuations of the rise and fall of history and civilizations. In the above section, the Magistrate addresses the fear at the root of the Empires frontier policies, whereby it  works feverishly to stave off the threatened end, an end made more imminent by the historical perception that foresees it  (Castillo 81). From the onset, Coetzee wishes to establish the story within this context, and the cruel eventualities and deception of power and control. As settlers, the Magistrate and his neighbors, occupy a distinct role in the spread of imperialism they are representatives of an Empire from which they have been wholly removed but are still expected to emulate and imitate, even as the culture of the area in which they have colonized influences their basic survival from the kind of crops they farm, and how they farm them, to the types of homes they build. This sense of connection acts as a starting point for the Magistrates need to acknowledge the Empires role in the destruction of culture, while also seeking  justification of his own complicity in the atrocities of the Empire  (Urquhart 4). As an extension of the empire, he must accept a guilt he never fully embraces nor acknowledges, instead hiding behind a search for the truth.
    The Magistrates mention of the fear of the barbarians is, as previously noted, essential to an understanding of this pseudo-culture created from the notions of the Empire. Like the other settlers, he has no concrete understanding of the barbarians as people, the nomads are instead  opaque  (Castillo 82) in their relation to the Magistrate and his unfounded fear of their reprisal. The barbarians immaterial existence is the stuff of imagination for a man so deeply entrenched in the teachings of the Empire as the Magistrate and his fellow settlers. As they  live beyond the borders of the Empire  and  outside history, outside a time of catastrophe  (Castillo 82) he is unable to fully connect himself to their historical narrative of being. Instead, the Magistrates identity is solely a matter of conforming to his role, as predicted by by the Empire and his desire for a quiet life, to become  another grey-haired servant of Empire who fell in the arena of his authority, face to face at last with the barbarian  (Coetzee 16). In this image is the knowledge of long years of limited service to distant idea, that waxes and wanes independently of the actions of a minor official. The  grey-haired servant  knows the limitations of his power reach only to the gates of the settlement, which prove to be as temporary as life,  space is space, life is life, everywhere is the same  (Coetzee 16). He sees no escape from his future and is, at least in the beginning, willing to play his role within the larger drama of life as written by the Empire. He can try to understand  the barbarians as concepts of uncivilized society and novelties, this is allowed within the ideology of imperialism. However, when he begins to see the indigenous people as humans, and seeks to understand their difference, only to see there is little if any, the Magistrate violates the code of his own small civilization and the lessons of the Empire.

    Despite the Magistrates assertion of conscience in defending and protecting the native peoples, he is not immune to the established norms of behavior that characterize the settlers behaviors or even, he notes, the soldiers and Joll. The river people, as the first group of prisoners brought by Joll, are met at first with tolerance and then later with disdain and outright offense. Even the Magistrate describes a desire to be accommodating but not too tolerant of their presence,  I do not want a race of beggars on my hands  (Coetzee 19). While at first they provide a  diversion, with their strange gabbling, their vast appetites, their animal shamelessness, their volatile tempers  (19) their novelty soon wears off. The settlers begin to turn against the river people, and though the Magistrate does not participate in the pranks and cruelties he does not try to stop them either. His complacency creates feelings of shame, each new development is met with a resigned feeling of dread. This resignation begins to change as the once placid and predictable surface of  the Magistrates life begins to deteriorate. The voice of his conscience begins to whisper in his ear, showing him the inconsistency of his values. As a character, he represents interesting contradictions of morality as Castillo explains, he is  a killer who sees himself as a savior, a torturer who rejects identification with others of his kind  and represents, in certain respects,  as much a symbolic presence for the barbarians as the barbarians are for the colonialists  (85). As a citizen of the Empire, living on land that was once free for habitation by any wandering tribe, the Magistrates presence as a settler is more damaging in many respects than the fleeting presence of the soldiers.

    Despite the role he plays in the expansion of imperialism, the Magistrate realizes that despite his apathy, he cannot accept the interference of the Empire and its cruelties within this small culture as mere rote,  if I resolved to ride out the bad times, keeping my own counsel, I might cease to feel like a man who, in the grip of the undertow, gives up the fight, stops swimming, and turns his face towards the open sea and death  (Coetzee 21). He recognizes that to give into the pressures from afar would be to finally give up his individuality and freedom from the Empire, calling into question his youthful motivation to travel to the frontier, which is never addressed in the narrative. While this may simply be to highlight the notion that this is the  grey-haired servants  narrative, it is more importantly, I believe, a means of illustrating the complete transition of his character. There is no way, with his knowledge of the world beyond the capital and the means by which the Empire expands, for him to regain that innocence,  I know somewhat too much and from this knowledge, once one has been infected, there seems to be no recovering  (Coetzee 21). The Empire is no longer a distant father but instead has grown into an  empire of pain  (23) that disturbs the delicate balance on which the colony functions. The Magistrate understands that the events effecting the settlement are not simply a localized phenomena Joll is a cloned foot soldier, who explains to the Magistrate that while the victory at this particular settlement may seem limited, the Empire had made progress,  Particularly when you consider that similar investigations are being carried out elsewhere along the frontier in a co-ordinated fashion  (Coetzee 23). Though hes always known, the conversation with Joll serves as a brief realization of the territories beyond the Magistrates own small settlement. The inverted viewpoints of the community and Magistrate are particulars of their situation. They have literally come to see their small settlement as the center of a disjointed universe with the Empire characterized as a far-off dream and the wilderness in between as an abyss that hovers just beyond their doorstep.

    The Magistrates change in character, while in many ways simply bringing to the surface dormant aspects of a personality grown lazy in its habits, is also a gradual though speedy metamorphosis. Within the space of a year, the Magistrates entire world is violated and turned upside down but in the end returns to its previous routines. The arrival of Joll, the prisoners, the barbarian girls arrival in his life, his travel into the wilderness, his loss of position and his time as a victim of the Empire, and finally the restoration of his position all occur within a single cycle of the seasons. From the beginning, the Magistrate senses these changes and attempts to hide behind a practiced ignorance of the changes to his small world. When Joll leaves for the winter the first time, withdrawing to the safety and familiarity of the capital, the Magistrate is happy for the departure but is left with the fresh scars of the damage inflicted by Joll and his compatriots. He contemplates the damaged people, river people and nomad alike, and  the notion of erasing the memory of this misdeed of the Empire crosses his mind,  It would be best if this obscure chapter in the history of the world were terminated at once, if these ugly people were obliterated from the face of the earth and we swore to make a new start, to run an empire in which there would be no injustice, no pain  (Coetzee 24).

    However, no matter how ignorant he has made himself to the morals and conventions of imperialism, he cannot erase the world he has seen though it will no doubt be rewritten by those who make policy and history. The cries of the river people and the nomads will go unrecorded in the written records, remaining representations of the unknown that is being destroyed for the betterment of the Empire. Their torture at the hands of Joll reinforces the Magistrates initial thoughts of this group of natives expendibility torture, as a tool of the Empire,  means a total negation of a social world that grants life, acts to alleviate their suffering, and does not brand them as beasts, the better to legitimize their extermination  (Spencer 175). It proves to be effective, as had the Magistrate been capable of viewing them as his equals, he would likely never have considered such a massive cover up for the sake of convenience and forgetting. However, having seen the injured and dead, cannot escape the reality of history and is instead left wondering at his own service to the continuation of the Empire,  I struggle on with the old story, hoping that before it is finished it will reveal to me why it was that I thought it worth the trouble  (Coetzee 25). The Magistrate believes that there must be some kind of long buried redemption in his existence, separate from the offenses of the Empire but realizes as well that he has been created in its image. His relationship with the barbarian girl is a way to reconcile this image within his own personal morality and understanding of the world. She is representative of the Otherness that the Empire seeks to destroy and in her he hopes to find a reason for the rationale by which his entire life has been based upon.

    The Magistrates relationship with the barbarian girl is a complicated affair his guilt and propensity for understanding the causes and effects of his small universe, prompt him to look for answers in the pliable and tortured flesh of the girl. Though very different in background and native cultures, they are equally creations of the imperialist notions of the Empire. More than at any other time, the Magistrate identifies with men such as Joll in his attempt to peel away the layers of the girl and discover her differences. Elated by her damaged body, when he first brings the girl to his room, he circles her like an exhibit in a museum and assumes an official stance of power. Through the assertion of his own established role as local official, as she herself is left adrift in the settlement and cut off from her own people, the Magistrate reinforces the invisible line that divides them. He cannot yet see the similarities in their situations and relies on the separation between the colonizer and the Other to help create an identity in relation to the girl. In this way, the Magistrate recognizes that he is no better than the men whod blinded and crippled her, both searching for a truth of their own making,  The distance between myself and her torturers, I realized, is negligible  (Coetzee 27). Like the Magistrate, Joll and his fellow torturers were looking for a subjective truth to justify their own views. As Stef Craps explains,  Joll produces marks of torture on the bodies of his victims only to read these marks as signs of guilt. The only truth that he extracts from the barbarians is the one he has projected onto them  (62). They are unable to view the barbarian girl objectively and separately from their focused cause of expansion, instead both the Magistrate and Joll conspire individually to  author the colonial other, to impose an identity upon them  (Craps 62). The Magistrate approaches the girl with similarly conceived notions that have little to do with her individual trials so much as within her identification within the mechanics of imperialism. However, unlike men such as Joll, the Magistrate is able to realize, what Craps identifies as,  the inadequacy of the imperial values and practices  (63). He comes to discover in the girl a formerly unrealized depth and resistance to the Empires definition of native identity while also illustrating in his lack of perspective on the girl, a deeply seated  resistance to the Empires self-affirmatory endeavor to impose an identity  (Craps 63).
    The Magistrates realization of the symmetry between his role and that of Joll, does not completely keep his impulses in check. In understanding the barbarian girl, the Magistrate hopes to come to a better understanding of himself. However, he underestimates the damage of the abuse and demoralization exacted upon the young girl, telling her,  Nothing is worse than what we can imagine ... dont make a mystery of it, pain is only pain  (Coetzee 32). Prior to his own torture, he cannot perceive of the dehumanization at the base of the Empires expansion. He does not yet realize that in his connection to the Empire, as a settler and colonizer, has made him both an accessory and a victim in the stripping of individuality. To the bureaucrats in the capital, the Magistrate is simply another local administrator just as the girl is only a barbarian, neither is viewed within the context of their individual needs or wants but rather their usefulness in imperialistic expansion. The Magistrate gradually comes to understand the physical, emotional, and mental damage exacted through stripping the girl of her father, her culture, and her humanity but does not at first understand his own victimization. Within any cultural definition, the girl has been damaged, she is neither part of her tribe nor the settlement. In a similar way the Magistrate is living a life marooned between two realities, the life proscribed to him as an extension of the Empire and the life he desires, neither of which he belongs to.
    The emotional and mental damage of this level of reconstituting an individuals cultural disintegrating, teamed with the persistence of the Magistrates fascination with the girl, creates a bond between the two characters. The Magistrate adapts to his own strange affections and a growing awareness of how the broken pieces of the girls body are only a small representation of the complete break from civilized behavior that characterizes men such as Joll. In their emotional distance from one another, the pair develops a connection from the routine of their parallel lives. What is interesting in the cyclic nature of their relationship is the similarity between the rise and fall in the Magistrates fascination and affection for the girl and the same rise and fall in the Empire and the settlers  perception of the indigenous people of the area. Like the fisher people, who were at first a novelty in their newness and then reviled in their inability to mesh seamlessly with the norms of the settlement, the Magistrate develops an aversion to the girl,  I cease to comprehend what pleasure I can ever have found in her obstinate, phlegmatic body, and even discover in myself stirrings of outrage  (Coetzee 41). Unable to understand her completely, he temporarily turns away to the familiarity of the world hed known before, personified in the bird-like fluttering of the prostitute at the inn. With the play-acting of the blond girl he is able to delude himself into temporarily forgetting his connection to the torture and abuse of the Empire and his own complacency in its dealings. Even faced daily with the barbarian girls presence, the Magistrate attempts to regain his dreaming existence of bygone days when he felt no connection to the cruelties of the world,  there is nothing to link me with the torturers ... I must assert my distance from Colonel Joll I will not suffer for his crimes  (Coetzee 44). Only when he realizes that he is suffering because of his own crimes, that his own role within the mechanics of imperialism is what is creating his feelings of shame and eventual action, does he turn once more to the girl.

    The Magistrates conscience and awareness of his guilt in the damage wrought to the girl is important in illustrating how the Magistrate both embodies and rebels against the notion of a culture of imperialism. He is, as he describes himself as seen through the eyes of the young officer,  a minor civilian administrator sunk, after years in this backwater, in slothful native ways, outmoded in his thinking, ready to sacrifice the security of the Empire  (Coetzee 51). In his rebellion, he becomes a cliche in the propaganda of the Empire. Rather than being seen as enriched by his realization of the connectivity of all people to a common existence, the Magistrate is viewed as backward and opposed to the Empire itself,  His worst suspicion is no doubt confirmed that I am unsound as well as old-fashioned  (Coetzee 52). He comes to see that the new surge of interest toward this particular settlement is a development of the growth of the Empire beyond the boundaries of what he had previously imagined and what he can reasonably grasp. In returning the girl to her people, the Magistrate is rebelling against this new growth, hoping to retain a separateness that will allow him to live the life that had been disrupted by Jolls arrival. In addition, he is refusing to accept the Empires idea that the girl does not belong anywhere, not even to her own culture, and is instead damaged goods that has become a part of the secondary system of the hierarchy inherent to the colony. Outside of this structure, outside of their common culture within the settlement, where each fulfills a role imagined for them, the Magistrate and the girl come closer to equality than ever before. In the context of the unknown wilderness, they are finally removed from their own roles within the settlement. They have come to a neutral ground, that allows the girl to rise above the persona created for her in the Magistrates struggle to equalize his uncertain feelings. Sensing this new balance, the Magistrate reacts favorably and  makes love to her. He is able to relax and embrace his own desire for her through re-individualizing himself and finding the human connection in his dealings with the girl. He is finally able to see the girls full humanity and feel a connection to her,   In twelve days on the road, we have grown closer than in months of living in the same rooms  (Coetzee 70). By losing his illusions of her, the Magistrate is able to let her become more than a representation of the Otherness that fuels the contempt of the Empire. In the same way, his own identity is reinforced by his final acceptance of the girl and the reconciliation of his contradictory feelings. As he and the men make their way back to the fort he notes,  All I want now is to live out my life in ease in a familiar world, to die in my own bed and be followed to the grave by old friends  (Coetzee 75). He has returned, with a little more perspective, to his previous feelings of living a life of ease, separated from the violent influence of the Empires minions.

    No matter how reconciled he seems to be in his new feelings toward himself and the girl, the Magistrates return to the settlement marks the beginning of his final showdown with the Empire,  I sense a faraway tinge of exultation at the prospect that the false friendship between myself and the Bureau may be coming to an end  (Coetzee 77). As an offshoot of the imperialistic vision of community, the Magistrates role is easily turned around to become that of scapegoat. His act of kindness and resolution to reunite the girl with her people become a matter of rebellion and treason. Like the past victims of the Empires violence, the truth becomes relative in their interpretation of morality and blind nationalism. The Magistrates actions have, by their very construction, caused him to  set himself in opposition  (Coetzee 78) of the workings of the Empire. In the eyes of the Empire, the Magistrate should have maintained his distance and indifference by crossing into the frontier and making contact with the barbarians he has upset the very precept that has fueled imperialist expansion, namely in his recognition of the barbarians humanity and connectedness to himself and other settlers.

    The Magistrates recognition of the darkness inherent to the ignorance of a patriotism that spreads and overwhelms such territories prompts him to view the systematized workings of the Empires bureaucracy for the cancer it is. Addressing one of his guards on the construction of the new prison cells, the magistrate quips,  time for the black flower of civilization to bloom  (Coetzee 79). It is a short-sighted and destructive reworking of the traditions by which the settlement has operated. The actions of the soldiers and the Bureau administrators create havoc in the system of  settlement life. As the soldiers begin their attempt to root out traitors and barbarians, they destroy not only the morale of those under their control but also the sustainable relation between the Empire and the settlers. Burning the brush near the river, the Bureau shows its lack of understanding and its unwillingness to adapt to the particular terrain while equally showing an inability to look past th present to the future,  They do not care that once the ground is cleared the wind begins to eat at the soil and desert advances. Thus the expeditionary force against the barbarians prepares for the campaign, ravaging the earth, wasting our patrimony  (Coetzee 82). As Castillo explains these actions are based, like many of the Empires policies in a fear of the unknown,  For men of the Empire, men of the city, open lands represent no less a threat than the imagined barbarian armies, and, just as they torture barbarian captives, so too they destroy the land  (81). More important in regards to this discussion on the culture of imperialism, is the fact that through these actions the Empire has not simply destroyed the cover of the barbarians, who as nomads have a broader base of existence and can simply move on to another oasis, they have also destroyed the sustainability of the satellite culture of their own settlement.

    The destruction of the world the Magistrate has come to know is shadowed by the destruction of his body and persona as a servant to the Empire. He has become its enemy and will suffer for his understanding of the barbarians, however limited that understanding may be. By learning and growing close to the barbarian girl, the Magistrate has undermined the basis of the culture of imperialism. He has not simply made contact with the barbarian but has come to a deeper realization of truth in defining civilization. In doing so, he has been swept into the depth of its mechanics, where he will become a victim of their systematized cruelties and dehumanizing tactics,  They will use the law against me as far as it serves them, then they will turn to other methods. That is the Bureaus way. To people who do not operate under this statute, the legal process is simply on instrument among many  (Coetzee 84). While he had previously felt a distance between his own conscience and the edicts of the Empire, he had retained a complacency and acknowledgment of its role in his life. Having passed the limits of the Empire, he is now able to view it as the man made manifestation of an intricate ideology, that is only a model of control and domination. Like a rapist, exacting complete control over its victim, the Empire has dismantled the the individuality of its subjects and the indigenous people it seeks to marginalize within their own land. While the Magistrates relationship and return of the barbarian girl symbolizes his transition from denial to a moral enlightenment, the process of being imprisoned and tortured, bring to light the physicality of humanity. The torture and degradation he experiences is meant to dehumanize him, not simply in his own eyes where he becomes,  no more than a pile of blood, bone and meat that is unhappy  (Coetzee 85) but also in the eyes of the Bureau officials, the soldiers, and the people of the settlement. His imprisonment removes him from the workings of the community, and usurps his position within the efforts of imperialism. As another type of Other, not easily defined by the constraints of the Empire, the Magistrate comes to be condemned and more easily viewed as subhuman. In viewing him in this manner, the Empire can justify his destruction. Through the torture inflicted by the minions of the Empire, the Magistrate  comes to the recognition of the only meaning he can accept unequivocally, the recognition of his own abjection  (Castillo 80). In this recognition, the Magistrate comes closest, within the confines of the imperialistic culture, of identifying himself with the Other he has long been taught to despise.

    Throughout the physical and mental anguish of his imprisonment, the Magistrate retains a sense of the impermanence of his situation. He is a man,  biding my time till this phase of history grinds past and the frontier returns to its old somnolence  (Coetzee 95). Like the fear of the barbarians, the seasonal shifts of the nomads, and the changing tides of the politics coming from the capital, the Magistrates position in society follows a cyclic pattern. As Moses notes,  The magistrates liberal faith in the progressive potential of history rests upon his conviction that ... he represents a civilized standard of behavior, supported and circumscribed by the rule of law, that must be invoked if the brutalities and injustices of both the barbarians and the Empire are to be checked  (119). His premonition of  an abatement in the Empires interest in the inhospitable terrain beyond the settlement, and the eventual withdrawal of Joll and the soldiers bares fruit in the end, when the Magistrate returns to his old position within the community on the departure of the soldiers and Bureau men. Behind this eventual, and unofficial reinstatement of position, is the Magistrates understanding that as a product of the settlement he can no longer exist outside of its context. The wilderness beyond the settlement and the urban wilderness of the capital are equally dangerous to his notions of self and the world in general.  So removed has he been from the outside turning of time, that the Magistrate would be unable to function outside his present context. He can visualize no resolution that will work within the realities of the world as he has come to know it or that will reconcile with is conscience. Despite his knowledge that the settlement has become a symbol of the inference and destruction of the Empire, the Magistrate realizes that the campaign has drawn on too long for an integrated solution,  Easier to lay my head on a block than to defend the cause of justice for the barbarians for where can that argument lead but to laying down our arms and opening the gates of the town to the people whose land we have raped  In the mindset central to imperialism, this is neither wise nor inevitable but something to be protected against through the continuation of hate as a means of separation between the indigenous cultures and distinct culture of the settlers.


    The Magistrates place within the culture of imperialism is defined not by his work nor the resurgence of conscience that plagues him throughout the novel but instead through his contradictions in fact, it is the nature of the culture of imperialism itself to be contradictory, creating in the Magistrate a characterization of the moral fragmentation of identity at the basis of the settlement. As a culture based on concepts of racial and cultural marginalization, expansion, and the decimation of competing indigenous societies, imperialism is a poison that leaves destruction in its path. The Magistrate provide a fatally flawed example of the good intentions of similar men and women within the context of Empire building. He has a strong understanding of the concepts of right and wrong, knowing that the violence of men such as Joll is neither humane nor just. However, his wish in the end to  live outside the history the Empire imposes on its subjects  (Coetzee 154) is a reassertion of the culture of the settlement.

    While some critics have viewed the narrative within the context of justice and the  the narratization of oppression  (Urquhart 4). The truths of discovered in the Magistrates examination of self and society become only half realized. In returning to the cycle of living with which he has become accustomed, he remains a product and, ultimately, a tool for the Empire. Despite his defense of the barbarians, his affection for the girl, and his own role as Bureau scapegoat, the Magistrate cannot completely move beyond a mindset shaped by images and propaganda aimed towards separating society along racial and national boundaries. The pseudo-culture of the settlement has been too deeply ingrained into the fabric of his life this frontier is his home, he does not belong culturally to the world beyond his doorstep, but nevertheless belongs to the concept of the settlement. The oasis the settlement is situated upon was once a free area, like the wilderness surrounding it, that was effectively destroyed within the native context by the annexation of the area by a foreign power. His role in imperialism is neither harmed nor altered by his previous incarceration but has been altered by a new awareness which while prompting contemplation, did not in the end cause change. The Magistrate has come full circle, and is lost between the two realities of the Empire and the barbarians as hed been in the beginning, left with feelings of  something staring me in the face, and I still do not see it (Coetzee 155). To the Magistrate, the settlements existence is a  paradise on earth  (Coetzee 154) allowing him to straddle two worlds and exist in the culture and dreams of imperialism, if not its reality.

Memoir or Navel Gazing Application to Mario Lopezs Madre de Dios

Reflecting and applying the principles of memoir writing to Mario Lopezs Madre de Dios, it can be argued that it falls along the lines and parameters of memoir. The reason behind this is not mainly because it falls under the category provided by Gutkind in his book but also supplement the necessary conditions paving the way for (1) exposition of experience, (2) ability to provide genuine interaction with readers, and (3) look into personal feelings as it questioned its capacity and ability to induce change.
    One important component that shapes Lopezs work involves having the capacity to provide readers with the experience she had made. As Gutkind provides, a good memoir writer uses life experiences, not to go more deeply to the self but to reach out to others (p.116). Here, not only does it tackle his pursuits and exploits during college life, he sought to immerse the reader in understanding the predicament that he feels and sought to find the connection about what other people may relatively feel about the process of questioning their faith.
    Moreover, it also connotes the facilitative effort to enrich ones capacity to induce change. It can be seen that throughout his life, Lopez had sought to find the meaning of the divine like everyone else. From the constructs in education, towards the new processes shaping his life, Barry Lopez sought to find understanding in the conditions that relatively contributed to his life and to others as well (Lopez, p.92). Though he may have sought to provide more of an analogy about himself, the process and application of this was to establish among readers the value he perceives in the realm of spiritual connection.
    Another relevant theme that corresponds as to why Lopezs work is considered a memoir is Madre de Dios ability to extract genuine interaction of the author towards readers. This argument corresponds to the notion and value of how ones personal perspective can be shaped not only by personal lessons but also on experiences in life. As the idea of Gutkind puts it, in writing and elsewhere  only when it moves through, then transcends the self and connects to whats human in us all (p.118). 
    This perspective can be seen in the way Lopez seeks to provide readers concerning religious encounters and how it can change a mans life. At the same time, the process of connections and interaction with a higher divine being is one characteristic that is prevalent among readers who might read the selection. This then becomes the catalyst in showcasing how one mans life continuously questioned by doubt becomes an important avenue towards enlightenment (Lopez, 2008).
    Despite the storys exaggerated view about certain things, it only denotes the ability of Lopez to present his feelings to readers. It showcases the ability to become instrument of highlighting and showcasing a renewed attempt to become engaged ones more in faith amidst the challenges and situations that have shaped the authors life in the book. This then goes to show the capacity to make effective the ability to look forward for a better future.
    The last reason for choosing Madre de Dios as a memoir reflects the idea of the personas capacity to induce change or become an instrument for change. This coincides with the perspective of showcasing an approach not rooted mainly on oneself and their corresponding experiences but rather an attempt to provide the ability to look outside of the box and seek out change (Gutkind, 2008). This relevant perspective as it applies to Madre de Dios was exemplified in the development of the character in the story. Here, the process not only implored on showcasing how he felt during this period. What was shown is his perspective and relevant ideas on as to how or why these were created and the strategies he used to adapt to these trends.
    Seeing this, the ability of Madre de Dios not only circumvents the exploits of one mans pursuit towards finding his faith, but also seeks to question the current conditions in society that shapes such beliefs towards its development or decline. The outputs here and experiences gained all highlight the relevance of how change can influence things. From a simple decision to a complex one, the process of reaching out is achieved ones the desire for change becomes evident. It pursues the objective of catering towards finding the true meaning in all of these. Such effort provided the necessary inputs not only in fostering growth but also the ability to become an important catalyst for readers to appreciate the content given.
    In the end, the process of creating literature has its corresponding standards and ideals that provide guidelines for writers to adhere to.  The same process can be seen and applied under the conditions of memoirs. It is relevant to consider in determining and differentiating one from navel gazing reflects not only on the capacity to respond to these rules but also justify the impact it can provide among readers. It is through the passion towards an outward connection and ability to transcend experiences to readers that Lopezs Madre de Dios qualifies to such characterization.

EL1

Director of health,
Tempe city, Arizona,
Phone (480) 965-9011, Email  HYPERLINK mailtoaskasuasu.edu askasuasu.eduLocation University Drive and Mill Avenue, Tempe, AZ.
2nd December 2, 2009.
RE Solutions to reduce the high cost of healthcare in Tempe, Arizona.
    It is with deep concern that I write this letter requesting your office to do everything in your power to ensure a reduction of healthcare costs to save the middleclass and low class from medical problems. According to reports in the media and research conducted recently, this segment of our population is hard pressed and cannot be able to afford quality health care when they need it. This is unfortunate since healthcare should be a right for all and not reserved only for those who have the financial means.
    One thing that I urge your office to consider is incorporating cost sharing in our health system so that the burden of paying for healthcare is shared by the state and citizens. This will ensure that humble citizens who cannot afford high healthcare costs get access to quality healthcare. In doing so we will help our citizens to access medical attention any time they get sick and in turn they will be healthy and productive members of the society.
    Another important aspect that can assist to reduce the cost of healthcare is by promoting the use of healthy food among the citizens. This can be done through mass advertisement and education to inform our people on the importance of feeding on healthy diet. Since most of our people are computer literate I propose that the education be done through information communication technology (ICT). Research shows that more 60 million Americans are obese and another 127 million are overweight. These problems are mostly associated with eating fast foods. If people can be educated to avoid fast foods but instead feed on slow food that is fresh and quality, the cost of healthcare will go down since diet related illnesses will be few.
    Sir, I also request your office to consider ordering big and medium companies within your area of jurisdiction to introduce worksite health clinics to cater for the health needs of their workers. Although research shows that 27 of big companies in USA have established work site clinics, this is too little compared to health needs of workers. I propose that when your office is formulating policy guidelines, you put it as a requirement that all big and medium companies should set up worksite clinics to take care of their workers.
    I also find it absolutely necessary for your office to consider introduction of mini-meds or limited health programs within Tempe city. This programme shall be aimed at introducing low cost preventive plans as compared to catastrophic programmes.  It is always cheaper to prevent a disease than curing it.
I am looking forward to a favorable cooperation.
Yours faithfully,
George Hightower.
Second Letter
Susan Adams,
Students leader, Arizona state University,
Phone (480) 965-9011Email  HYPERLINK mailtoaskasuasu.edu askasuasu.eduLocation University Drive and Mill Avenue, Tempe, AZ

The mayor of Arizona State,
 City Office (623) 930-2260City Fax (623) 937-2764E-mail  HYPERLINK mailtomayorscruggsglendaleaz.com mayorscruggsglendaleaz.comLetters City of Glendale, 5850 W. Glendale Ave., Glendale, AZ 85301.
2nd December 2, 2009.
RE Transportation problems due to too much maintenance of roads in Tempe city
    This letter is intended to inform you about the problems students and other commuters are facing in Tempe city when going on with their daily businesses due to the above mentioned problem.
    Sir, as a scholar I recognize the need to have an efficient transport system and this can only be done by ensuring that our roads are well maintained. On the other hand I dont want to turn a blind eye to the problem resulting from too much maintenance of roads especially the one leading towards Arizona State University. The maintenance is causing big inconveniences to students due to traffic jams.
    Having consulted widely with fellow students we have resolved to suggest to your office ways of resolving the aforementioned problem amicably without further delays since it might result to a demonstration by the students body which might lead to a bigger mess.
    The first option was to consider a ban for all private vehicles from getting into the city during the duration of road maintenances and instead advice everybody to use public means of transport as a way of minimizing the number of vehicles on the roads and eventually ease traffic jams in Tempe city. The decision was reached after some of our students conducted a survey and found out that the private vehicles formed a huge percentage of vehicles on the road and if they were eliminated, traffic jams would eventually ease.
    The second suggestion was to request your office to negotiate with air travel companies so that they can subsidize their air tickets for the students of Arizona State University. We humbly request your office to recognize that time is money and the more time students waste in traffic jams it will compromise their educational performance. In conjunction with your office, we believe that air companies operating within Tempe city will understand and consider our request.
    The last but not the least recommendation is that your office should consider building diversion roads to be used by vehicles for the duration that maintenance is going on within Tempe city. This will ensure that the whole project moves fast because there will be no interruptions by commuter vehicles.
We look forward to further cooperation with your office.
Yours faithfully,
Susan Adams
Student leader, Arizona State University.

Life in Omelas

Long long time ago, people lived in small law-less societies. As civilization grew, so are the rules. Today, we have laws for almost everything  from crossing the street to migrating to another land, from resolving family conflicts to wars between nations, from giving birth to burying the dead. We either live by the societys rules or suffer the consequences. Yet we call ourselves free.

Ursula K. Leguin and Kurt Vonnegut presented utopian societies in Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas and Harrison Bergeron respectively. Both stories reflect the discord between individuals interests and the societies limitations. Echoing Leguin and Vonneguts ideas, this paper believes that societys rules exist to balance conflicting human interests and preserve order. However, it should not restrain peoples potential to grow and become productive members of the society.

Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas by Ursula K. Le Guin
The story is about Omelas, a place where happiness, celebrations, friendships, health and abundance thrives. The people in Omelas are not barbarians and not less complex than us but they are happy. They are not bothered by the issues and problems we face in our society. According to the author, Omelas do not have cars or helicopters, stock exchange, the advertisement, the secret police, and the bomb or any of the destructive things that plague our society. What they have is comfort and the ability to be happy, something Lenguin believes people in our society have lost. However, Omelas is not that simple. Behind all the celebrations and joy, people know that something else is there. According to the story, people knew and some have seen it. Some have cried at the injustice, but they all understand that their happiness, the beauty of their cityeven the abundance of their harvest and the kindly weathers of their skies, depend wholly on this childs abominable misery. Despite the guilt and the pain, people accepted the injustice as part of their lives. Those who could not bear it left Omelas and never returned.

    According to Bennett, the story is Le Guins way of showing the Western worlds indifference to the sufferings of other people (65). The miserable child represents the less fortunate members of our society- the victims of war, people in Africa, children living in the streets, people working in sweatshops and others which we are fully aware of but chose to ignore. People lost their homes but the bank and lending industry cannot lower interest rates because it could harm the economy. Some people need to be sacrificed to save the majority and that is a fact of life.   

Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut
In Harrison Bergeron, Vonnegut described a society where everyone is equal. People who are more beautiful or smarter than others are given handicaps to level the field. People are not allowed to use their brains. There is no competition in the workplace or anywhere else. People had become nothing but robots, all for the sake of equality. In the story, George was quoted saying, If I tried to get away with itthen other peopled get away with it-and pretty soon wed be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else. Vonneguts utopian world views a society where people are free to do what they want and think what they want as the dark ages. In Vonneguts society, majority of the people need to sacrifice and give up their natural advantages in order to remain equal with the rest of the population. There are no individual growths, everything is for the society. Harrison Bergeron is the rebel who wanted to be something more than what the society allows him to be.   

In a twisted way, Vonnegut portrays the society of our dreams- a society where everybody is equal, where being better, smarter or quicker is a liability, where natural gifts need to be repressed to prevent individual progress. In this society, only the mediocre is sacred. It is a satire of our law-laden culture. While laws are needed to preserve peace and cooperation, too much of it could lead to a robotic society where people need to rely on written rules rather than make use of their talents and aptitudes. Another consequence of this society is that, people were not exactly equal because they are under the control of Diana Moon Glampers, the United States Handicapper General and her armies. Equality was just an excuse to repress people like Harrison Bergeron from achieving their full potential. Handicaps were provided not to promote equality but also to preserve the power of the authorities.

According to Fish, meanings are not extracted from the text but made by the audience who are touched by it (cited in Cox 35).  In the same way that fables are told for their moral lessons, stories are supposed to teach something. As allegories of our modern society, the stories depict how our society thrives on the sacrifices of the lesser fortunate and the containment of those who are threats to what we believe to be right. One illustration of this allegory is the recent financial crisis brought by the subprime properties and lending fraud.  

Subprime Lending and Mortgage Fraud
    The recent financial crisis that rocked the world is mainly attributed to unregulated subprime property lending. The growth of the real estate business contributed to the increase in the US gross domestic product (GDP) in the previous years (Baily  Elliot 6). Baily and Elliot added that the real estate boost is accompanied by increase in demand for furniture, appliances, carpets and other household goods which resulted to increase in real estate prices and household wealth (6). The boom in real estate industry attracted both local and international investors to the market. Homeownership became a symbol of wealth (Griffin 2), however, some minority groups like African Americans and Hispanics were discriminated from the bank lending guidelines. To advance their causes, Congress passed the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) in 1997 relaxing lending rules to accommodate the minority. This law evolved and resulted to the creation of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and Federal Home Loan Corporation (Freddie Mac) which enabled the mortgage of subprime properties (Griffin 3). This law provided equal opportunity for the minority to buy their own homes. However, it also opened the door to unethical investors and professionals who were driven by greed (Griffin 4).

This is similar to Vonneguts society where equality turned out to be a self-defeating end. People who had the capability exploited the law to promote their own selfish motives and the people who were supposed to benefit from it ended as the scapegoats. They lost their homes because they were unable to pay for their mortgages. In the midst of the crisis, the government ended up bailing the banking and lending corporations while their victims lost their properties.

Does the government know Yes. Do the people know Yes. But what have we done Nothing. Because like the citizens of Omelas we know it is not fair, we have seen the news, we have heard the people and seen their faces but we cannot do anything about it. We feel helpless and overwhelmed and thus we just accept is as the way things are. The victims of the mortgage fraud were hurting but like the child, they know their screams and cries for help will not be heard, so they speaks less and less often. They just sat in their cells and lived their life as it is, a half-bowl of corn meal and grease a day. It is not enough and it is not fair but it is life and there is nothing they can do.


Society exists to govern and safeguard the collective interest of the people. In the Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas and Harrison Bergeron, society is portrayed not just as a group of people and their laws but also their beliefs about what the society is and their roles as members of that society. In Vonneguts story, people accept the authority of the Handicapper General and her idea of an equal and advanced society even at the expense of their personal freedom and growth. In Omelas, people are willing to overlook the suffering of the child in order to maintain their happy and abundant lives. We might be wondering why people cannot just give up a little of their own comforts and ease the suffering of the child Or for something closer to home, why didnt the lenders just lowered the interest rates and let the people keep their homes, after all a lower profit would have been better than nothing. That could have surely made a difference, yet they chose not to and people suffered.

Like some of the courageous people of Omelas, it is tempting to walk away but unlike them there is no other place to go, at least nothing that guarantees a better life. That is a good reason for staying but if we are truly honest to ourselves, we know that we are not leaving because we are the citizens of Omelas, we are aware of the suffering in our society, in other countries, in the world in general but we are immune to it. Lastly, leaving Omelas is not the answer. Leaving Omelas will not change Omelas or make it go away, we need to change society into something that is more than just rules and norms, something that helps everyone to realize their full potential, whether they are gifted Harrison Bergerons or just a naked, imbecile child. Life is Omelas is about freedom and choice for everyone, unfortunately we are not living it yet.

My Last Duchess by Robert Browning

Although at first glance, Robert Brownings monologue My Last Duchess seems the story of a deep love articulated by the speaker, Duke of Ferrera, of the woman on a painting, Brownings use of literary elements in the poem reveals differently and reinforces themes of jealousy, power, self-predominance and control, including Marxist and feminist readings into a story that culminates with the demise of a former wife.  In his search for a new consort, the Duke manifests indirectly in flowery speech to a messenger of the Count of Tyrol, his contempt for his late wife and presents his defense as to why her death, whether by his hand or not, is justified. Literary devices such as speaker, setting and situation, images, figurative language, rhythm and meter, and rhyme enhance the description of the Dukes true nature, social circumstances, and the nature of injustice done upon his wife.

Speaker
    In the poem, the Duke of Ferrera is the only speaker, although there is the presence of a silent listener in the room (Everett, 2002). The manner in which the Duke directly addresses the silent listener (us) demonstrates the master-subject treatment that is expected when an aristocrat speaks to an individual unequal in social status. The Dukes aristocratic and authoritarian air also surfaces in the direct and curt manner that he addresses the messenger,  in line 47, Willt please you rise (line 47) and in lines 53 and 54, Nay, well go  Together down, sir. Everett (2002) opines that although the poem involves a conversation, the source of information is the Duke alone, hence its one-sidedness. This is in itself a representation of the Dukes arrogance and self-love.  Brownings choice in using the dramatic monologue is fitting because it exposes the Dukes love for self-indulgence and power as well as his controlling nature. Succeeding lines tell us more about the Dukes jealously, possessiveness and domineering personality. He is disgusted of his wifes innocence, bright disposition, and vivid personality.

    Setting
 Unlike most lyric poems, My Last Duchess has a definite geographical setting. The monologue takes place in a private art gallery in the aristocratic abode of the Duke of Ferrera in Renaissance Italy sometime in the mid-16th century, a favored setting that is used in many of Brownings work (Black, 1937 Yacobi, 2000). Allingham (2003) considers the choice important in order to properly depict the courtesy, dignity, artistic taste, and essential cruelty of a Renaissance autocrat. More importantly, the poems setting places the reader in a more comfortable position to understand not merely the historical circumstances that surround the monologue, but its social underpinnings. Through Brownings descriptions, the reader is made to understand that during this time and place, society was governed by clear-cut social structures, norms, mores and stereotypes, particularly those that govern the women of this era. The Dukes contempt for the Last Duchess was because of the latters unconventional disposition, where instead of being the private wife expected of her, she was more of  a public Duchess (Allingham, 2003). The Duchess lively disposition, bright personality, and friendly and buoyant nature was in contradiction to societys stereotypical view of women as passive, docile beings whose business should be limited to powdering their noses and keeping quiet in affairs that concern only the men. There is a feminist reading in Brownings poem as to how Victorian era society was characterized by a persistent male effort to restrain and dictate upon female sexuality.

Imagery
To make a clearer depiction of the character of the Duke and his opinion and treatment of his late wife, Browning effectively made use of Renaissance images (Black, 1937). The most apparent symbol used is the portrait of the late Duchess, painted on the wall by artist Fr Pandolf. The poem only tells the reader that the painting captures the Duchess bright personality and her love for life  a depiction that has distressed the Duke when her wife was still alive. But the painting itself and how it came to be tells us more about the Dukes personality. The painting is brilliantly done, and personified the Duchess as a person with depth and passion but the painting is kept hidden under a curtain so that the Duke may choose who can view it, none puts by the curtain I have drawn for you, but I, (line 10). Another image used by Browning in the poem is the bronze sculpture of Neptune Taming a Seahorse  which the Duke reveals was made specifically for him by Claus of Insbruck. Allingham (2003) treats this statue as a psychological projection of the Duke himself as both enjoy dominating what is beautiful, delicate, feminine, and natural. The Duke thinks of himself as the god of the sea, Neptune, controlling all his subjects, including the harmless and delicate seahorse which can be considered a representation of the Duchess. The Duke is no doubt a connoisseur of art but reading deeper into the poem, we learn that the pieces he collects are more importantly, used to display his wealth, dominance, and power. From a Marxist perspective, commodification is reinforced in the images Browning used. The scarcer and desirable the commodity, the higher the value. How the Duke transformed his wife into a painting and the fact that the painting was done by an artist Fr Pandolf,  in which the Duke only has access, turned his wife into a valuable commodity in death.

Figurative speech
Browning used figurative language in order to portray the Dukes resentment of his wife as well as his aristocratic arrogance. In describing his late wife to the messenger, the Duke uses euphemism to prove that his wife was a flirtatious woman, or, in his words, too soon made glad, which in the modern-day conversation would mean a woman easily pleased or coaxed. In several lines, the Duke argues unilaterally in front of the messenger the many ways that his late wife has dishonored her. He uses figurative language all throughout the poem to illustrate just how flirtatious his late wife was. For example, when the Duke said that her looks went everywhere, he meant that the Duchess loose way with her friendships with other men was a shameful act. The Dukes arguments centralized on the smiles of the Duchess. He is attempting to form an opinion on the messenger, in deliberately vague words, that his late wife had affairs with other men (Allingham, 2003). Upon her death, he is able to keep the Duchess smiling portrait behind a curtain for him to control. The picture of arrogance that eventually forms in the mind of the reader is strengthened when the Duke uses figures of speech such as stooping and his nine-hundred-years-old-name. The former is used by the Duke in order to describe a deed that is beyond his social status, as in conversation or his manner of addressing questions. For instance, he considers it inappropriate to address his wife about her indecent behavior because it would be a form of stooping. The latter reflects his high sense of self-importance, alluding that his late wife should consider it an honor to take his aristocratic name.  The Duke also uses paradox to present himself as a humble aristocrat who is often at a loss for words.  When he claims his lack in speech (line 36), the Duke was displaying his conceit and self-righteousness. He also indirectly gives the reader the idea that he murdered his wife out of intense jealousy from what he perceived as his wifes infidelity (smiles), so that in the end, he gave orders, all smiles stopped (lines 45-56).

    Rhythm and meter
Browning used the iambic pentameter for My Last Duchess. This iambic pentameter is illustrated clearly in the first two lines of the poem Thats my last Duchess painted on the wall, Looking as if she were alive. I call (lines 1-2). This choice reinforces the conversational tone of the poem. In this manner, the reader feels the rhetorical power of the Duke as if he was the one addressing.

    Rhyme
Browning uses a rhyme scheme following the formalized AA BB format. This reinforces the Dukes personality as a proper, aristocratic, and controlling individual who wields a substantial amount of power. Moreover, it dramatizes the Dukes contemptuous discourse and effectively presents him as a hurt and abused husband with a long laundry list of complaints against his late wife. The rhyme choice also strengthens the Dukes self-righteous personality and brilliantly contrasts with his ironic claim of his lack of skill in speech. Davis et al. (2000) suggests that Brownings use of enjambed lines reinforces the picture of the Duke restraining himself as he recounts his memory of his late wife. The enjambed lines illustrate the effort that the Duke is exerting as he presents his arguments to the messenger. When recalling his dead wife, the running lines reflect that the Duke is extremely uneasy about the subject (Davis et al., 2000). Further, Brownings use of caesuras allays the suspicion on the reader of the Dukes hesitation, probably out of the guilt for commanding the murder of his wife .

Shakespeares plays

Shakespeares plays have always been interesting. I have seen a couple of adaptation of Hamlet in stage whether it is in minimalist props or the grandest of all sets. But regardless of which the importance of the play lies on its proper adaptation.
    Among other theatre versions it is also common that Shakespeares plays are made into movies. We have seen a couple of them even others are made in a modern setting minus the original lines. But as for the subject of this paper I will analyze the movie of Hamlet which was directed by Kenneth Branagh and also starred as the character himself. Unlike the other movie adaptation, this 1996 film was an epic on its own, it run for almost four hours and is said to be the first full length version of the play itself. The first thing that came into my mind while watching the movie was how it reminded me so much of those epic classics like Elizabeth Taylors Cleopatra. The length of the movie was quite exhausting but being a fan of Shakespeare plays I cant help but be captivated by every act and every scene. The watching of Hamlet live in theatre may be a different experience, usually when you see it on stage all of your senses are focused on the characters. The blocking is important, the set and the imagination of the audience are expected, but when we watch it on screen everything is more simplified. The set, actors and cinematography interprets its own meaning based on how it is seen by the director.
    The set in Branaghs version is quite interesting, though we know that the original Hamlet set was made in 1300 Denmark what he did was put in in a 19th century setting, it actually reminded me more of the last Romanovs of Russia and I also noticed how the costumes were made in detail, it was quite magnificent and the set was so clean and white. In the scene of the marriage of Claudius and Gertrude I noticed how Hamlet stood out as the only one wearing black, perhaps to show that he was still grieving for the death of his father as the whole country celebrates.
    As we all know in the play, Hamlets character is very complex, his ever-changing mood and character creates a never-ending climax for the audience not knowing who he really is. There is a certain mystery in him that the movie perhaps has effectively shown.  But Kenneth Branaghs performance of Hamlet was all so natural with a hint of theatre acting. It wont be surprised since Branagh is known to have played Adrian Nobles Hamlet in the Royal Shakespeare Company production of the play (Crowl, 2000).
Actually, the acting in the movie reminds you of old classic movies, a time where everything was more exaggerated than usual, but such is really expected for a movie based on a play. I was also captivated how Kate Winslet portrayed the role of Ophelia, her acting gave her sorrowful and melancholic character conviction. Though other Ophelia adaptation reflects more on her insanity, the movie captured Ophelia as a weak simple hearted woman whose heart was devoted to Hamlet. You can notice on Kate Winslets acting the love and devotion mixed with the confusion that she felt for the mad Hamlet. But when she played the part of insane Ophelia, Id say that the other versions were better like the one done by Helena Bonham Carter. Also it can be noted that the film has numerous celebrities who made a cameo appearance, such as Robin Williams as the referee in the fencing scene and it also had well known theatre actors playing the roles.
    I was also amazed how witty Branagh played the scene with Rozencrantz and Guildenstern (3.3.5 ), the transition from mockery to angry Hamlet was quite entertaining. And his soliloquies were performed excellently the famous to be or not to be (3.1.60) was interpreted by Hamlet talking to himself in the mirror. It created a sense of self-doubt as what Shakespeare intended to be felt by this complex character. In his fifth soliloquy (4.4.41), Branagh chose to deliver his lines in a snowy set, isolated in the cold as he philosophically questions his intentions and that of Fortibras. The role played by Rufus Sewel was also depicted well, and I was happy that this adaptation actually kept in that scene, the going of Fortibras to war and his returning as a courageous soldier after serving Denmark to be the next in line for the crown.
    The fencing scene (5.4.223) was also good, it gave a climax well deserved as they chased each other around the palace. The music through out the movie was also appropriate for the 19th century set that was made.
    Though there a minor set backs in the scene continuity, minor mistakes which may be expected in a full length movie such as this one. An example is when on the death of Hamlet his hands were placed open palmed in the floor then the next scene it was closed in a fist. But I guess that should be blamed on the editing.
For most people reading the play itself in Shakespeares language is quite difficult, watching it in a play with the actors acting may make it easier but still adds difficulty if you lack imagination but when it is adapted into the movies it is somehow simplified. With great casting of the talented actors and the superb set, watching this epic has created a sense of oneness with Shakespeares work and that overwhelming experience of seeing such a great piece of work in film.

Comparing the Viewpoints in Radley Balkos Absolutely

Government Has No Business Interfering with What You Eat  and Kelly Brownell and Marion Nestles  Not If Blaming the Victim is Just Another Excuse to Get the Industry Off the Hook
    As the level of obesity grows in the U.S., what we eat is becoming more and more a political matter. Once a matter between the individual and their physician, what people eat and how they eat is being increasingly debated among politicians. In their essay, Radley Balko and Kelly Brownell with Marion Nestle argue two sides of the debate over industry regulation of the health care industry. Balkos argument rests primarily on the issue of less government intervention in the publics lives. Seeing the efforts of legislatures and health care groups to pass legislation to intervene in the freedom of the industry as an infringement on personal and commercial freedoms, Balkos view is highly politicized and polarized by his refusal to see the issue outside of the context of a political agenda. To Balko, regulating the food industry is just another step towards socialized medicine. Brownell and Nestle take a different view, attacking the anti-regulation lobbys agenda as self-serving to the industry with little regard to the individual itself. They make a compelling argument, noting that the arguments against regulation bear a striking resemblance to other such arguments, particularly the tobacco industrys fight against regulation. Of the two arguments, Brownell and Nestle make a more accurate assessment of the situation of the individual than Balko, who for all his protestations against the absorption of individual choice into the greater sphere of politics he is in fact making it political.
    Balko presents at the onset of his argument several steps in recent years which have been taken to try and combat obesity. Among these have been sort of pseudo-campaigns within the government to ease the minds of health professionals who have spoken out against the growth of obesity. Budget money has been funneled to programs that promote a health life story, man schools have voted to remove snack and soda vending machines from school campuses, labeling requirements and potential taxes and bans on certain types of food all list within the range of measures proposed or enacted across the country. While I agree to an extent with his assertion that health and wellness should be an individual responsibility, it is difficult to ignore the symptoms of an industry that lacks health standards in the proper respect. If a  food company purposely manufactured a cookie laced with cyanide and sold it to the public, that company would be held criminally libel. Even if the consumer knew what was in the cookie, to knowingly produce something you know will increase a persons risk for death should be enough to ensure that such practices are regulated. Alcohol, tobacco, and medicine which all go into our bodies like food, with the exception of tobacco moving through our system in a similar manner, are highly regulated and with good reason. When left to themselves the tobacco companies redefined irresponsible marketing with ads aimed at children and tailored for women, presenting images of health and wellness that were unrealistic. In this same manner, particularly fast food companies present a product that is bad for your health but advertise it in a family-centered and active manner that in no way shows the true effects of eating Big Macs to an excess. Have you ever seen an obese person in a McDonalds commercial
    Balkos move into a debate over nationalized health care, while understandably related to the topic, bypasses how personal responsibility can be practiced. He does not discuss the psychology behind the individuals choice to eat unhealthily and whether it is truly an effective method. Perhaps, knowing the wealth of self-help health and nutrition related books he felt that this need not be explored further, but I feel the shift to be too abrupt. The debate over obesity and industry, not really individual, regulation is a prop and an introductory tool for introducing the wider argument of governments role in health care and the interrelated role of government interventions at different levels. Key to Balkos argument is that people, left to  their own devices, will choose what is right for them and take full financial and personal responsibility. However, he does not address the issue of childhood obesity, at which many of the regulations have been aimed at fighting. Who is taking responsibility for the children
    Kelly Brownell and Marion Nestles argument concentrates on the responsibility of the food industry in propagating the effects of unhealthy lifestyles. Food is business and the bottom line is the money. As they explain the number of food items geared toward children is astounding, fast food, high sugar beverages and snacks. If one were to consider it, the most iconic symbols of the food industry were created with children in mind. Trix, a cereal high in sugar and low in any other nutritional value,  is for kids  with a goofy rabbit forever trying to get just one bite. Lucky Charms or Cookie Crisp commercials are equally geared toward children. It is, Im sure, no mistake that each of these cereals rely on cartoons as advertisement vehicles. McDonalds gives out toys and buys advertisement rights for Disney and other kid related movies. To just blame obesity on the individual is to address only half of the problem. Yes, many adults are aware that they shouldnt stop at McDonalds or Burger King on the way home from work but we still do. It is cheap and it is convenient. As Brownell and Nestle also point out, it is biology for humans to crave that which is in excess bad for us. Sugar, fat, and calories all are craved by the human body. Their third part of the argument is based in the failure of self-regulation. Sure, it would be great if everyone would listen to their doctors and not eat that double cheese burger or pint of chocolate ice cream but given the increasing numbers of obese individuals its proven to be a failed experiment. They do not deny the necessity of personal responsibility in combating obesity in adults and particularly in children, their argument merely underlines the fact that, in itself, it is not enough.
    The food industry does not have its hands tied. There are alternatives to the traditional ingredients in many foods that have proved to be the most harmful. Bakeries in New York City, faced with the restraints of a trans fat ban, found new ways to make old favorites. It is not impossible to change but in a business ruled more by the bottom line than the well-being of its consumers, sometimes it is necessary to push for those changes making the private issue of health a public policy measure. Consumers will equally adapt there is no necessity in five fast food commercials in a ninety second commercial break or to have French fries come standard with two teaspoons of salt poured on top. If individuals such as Balko want people to take personal responsibility then let us put that extra salt on the fries and ask for the high fat content cheese product or mayonnaise. The push to regulate food companies does not infringe on personal rights but instead takes the responsibility of making those decisions out of the hands of the manufacturers and more  closely in the reach of the consumer themselves.

General overview of the FBI in the US security mission

    FBI stands for Federal Bureau of Investigation and is a government agency in the United States. It is an agency within the department of justices which deals with internal intelligence federal criminal investigation. FBI is mostly involved in investigating federal criminals and also is concerned with the internal intelligence. There are over two hundred federal crimes which can be investigated by FBI and which have violation of the criminal jurisdiction. The motto of the agency follows its initials Fidelity, Intelligence and Integrity.
    The headquarters of Federal Bureau of Intelligence are located at Washington D.C. Its staff is spread all over United States with field offices being set up in major cities and resident agencies being set up within towns. It is also served internationally by having offices within United States embassies available all over the world (Edward, 546)
    Federal Bureau of Intelligence has various mission and priorities to undertake. For instance, the budget of FBI in 2008 amounted to about 7billion with some of this allocation being directed towards some activities such as information technology, forensics, security allocations and cyber crime. It also allocated some of this to curb terrorism and intelligence.
    FBI was started as the Bureau of Investigation in 1908. It acquired this name until 1935 when it was transformed to its current name Federal Bureau of Investigation. Federal Bureau of Investigation has certain goal to achieve. Terrorist has been on the horizon together with foreign intelligence threats. The main goal of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is to defend and protect United States from these vices. They also enforce criminal laws in order to achieve justices within federal (David, 12). There are various priorities which FBI has set to address protecting civil rights, compacting violent crime, corruption and white collar crimes, protecting United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats and checking on cyber warfare. It also participates in combating criminal enterprises and organizations and upgrading of technology. The priorities of FBI are mostly directed to the protection of United States against foreign intelligence threats and terrorist. Information technology is an area of major concern for this agency and that is why they check on cyber warfare. Upgrading their technology enables them to counter both terrorist and foreign intelligences dangers which are issues of major concern in United States.
    Federal Bureau of Investigation has been involved in various activities in the past. For instance in 2007, it was involved in certain activities such as mail and bank frauds, drug trafficking cases, robbery and also fraud by wire. These investigations were carried out in coordination with the United States government. The working criteria of Federal Bereau of Investigation are covered in the U.S code. Crimes which are committed towards United States are controlled by this body whose officials are appointed by the Attorney General of United States (Cook, 23). Investigation of specific crimes by Federal Bureau investigation is also covered by the U.S statues. These statutes provide authority and responsibility to this body to interrogate specific crimes which are committed against United States.
    In the recent past, FBI has been involved in some controversial issues which have led to the intervention of the Supreme Court. Wire tapping was introduced to facilitate the arresting of bootleggers. This was first used by Hoover in 1920. There was a case which was taken to the Supreme Court challenging FBI for using wiretapping in arresting bootleggers. The Supreme Court took side with FBI arguing that there was no violation since FBI did not partake the tapping in somebodys house. There were certain Acts which were brought forth by Congress to facilitate the work of FBI. Bugging was allowed in the communication act which was passed by congress in 1934 (Davis, 14).  There were subsequent rulings by the Supreme Court which led to bugging being allowed in investigations. Public authorities were given the go ahead to tap telephones in the eve of investigations so long as they were allowed by having a warrant. This was covered in the Omnibus Crime Control and Streets act.
    Organized crimes are normally dealt with by FBI which has been given the mandate in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. This act enables FBI to investigate any organized crime. FBI is also concerned with the protection of civil rights. It does this by enforcing the correspondence of the Civil Rights Act which was passed in 1964. FBI is responsible for investigating any violation of this act and it is also involved in the prosecution of the violation. The prosecution is achieved by working hand in hand with the United States Department of Justice (Tiefer, 216). FBI undertakes investigation involving drug trafficking. They achieve this being guided by the Substance Act which was passed in 1970.
    Powers of FBI were enriched through the USA Patriot Act which gave more powers to this body. The increased powers involved dealing with crimes of internet activity and wire tapping. There are some critical provisions which are provided in the Act. This critical provision which is referred to as sneak and peeks allows FBI to carry out investigation in the absence of the residents. FBI is protected in this act not to inform the residents about the investigation. The Act also accords FBI to opening new files for suspect of terrorism from archived records. After investigation, FBI hands over its investigation report to an official in the department who decide the prosecution process (Gelbspan, 29). The Attorney decides on the go ahead after receiving the investigation report from FBI.
    FBI has been involved in several matters of national security. Since 1940 up to few years ago, the FBI has conducted several investigations involving espionage which were done against United States. There have been various arrests of people who have tried to sabotage the national security. For instance, there was the arrest of Nazi agents. These had the plan of sabotaging the American operations. Amongst the arrested agents, six were executed. The soviet saga led the heavy participation of FBI to break Soviet communications. This was done in collaboration of United States and United Kingdom. The FBI which was fully involved on the contribution to the tapping of the Soviet communication codes. The participation of Americans in the soviet intelligence was revealed. There are also notable arrests in which the FBI had a hand in, such as the arrest of Rudolf Abel who was a Soviet spy. The obsession of the Soviet came into being after the notification of the Soviet Spies in United States (Powers, Finnegan, 62). This was furthered by Hoover. Hoover led the FBI to ensure that all these spies were put at stake.
    The influence of civil rights movement also came to the concern of FBI. Civil rights leaders who led various movements in criticizing the FBI actions were seized. These movements were mostly active between 1950s and 1960s. Howard, who was one of the civil rights leaders found himself cornered after he was denounced by Hoover for his allegations of the FBI inaction. The FBI was involved in disrupting dissident political movements and non violent institutions. This was facilitated in the program they referred to it as Counter Intelligence Program. FBI disrupted the operation of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference which was amongst the forefront civil right institutions (McKnight, 54). FBI also targeted some prominent people for investigation such as Martin Luther King of which they even used some false allegation towards him due to lack of evidence of any crime.
    FBI has been involved in investigation of assassination of prominent people. FBI was accorded the mandate to investigate the assassination of John F Kennedy. This directive came from Lyndon Johnson who served as a president.  It led to the passing of the law which defined clearly who was responsible in dealing with homicides. FBI was given the responsibility of carrying out investigations on deaths of federal officials (Cook, 57). From this time henceforth, FBI has been responsible of investigating the deaths of government officials.
    Investigation of organized crime has also been of major concern. Top Hoodlum program was introduced in 1953 to enable tackle organized crime. This program geared at collecting of data of any mobsters of which it was to be centralized for analysis. This was to be facilitated by field officers. The field officers had to identify any organized crime within their territories and report them to the central offices. The passing of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act enabled FBI to counter the crime groups which were behind crimes in major cities and even small towns. The operations of FBI were one undercover. Being guided by the RICO act, FBI managed to dismantle all organized crime groups (Athan, 681). The lack of resources to deploy to counter the organized crime groups made Hoover to deny the presence of such groups in the United States. FBI carried out operations later to counter the organized crime. Some of the leaders of these groups were arrested such as John Gotti and Sam Giancana. The Act which was passed in 1953 is still in operation for organized crime.
    FBI has been involved fully in addressing terrorism. To counter terrorism during the summer Olympics which were undertaken in 1984, an elite unit was formed. The formation of this unit was as a result of the previous killings of Israel Athletes during the summer Olympics which were held in Germany. Terrorists were behind the murder. The unit was referred to as Hostage Rescue Team. Computer Analysis and Response unit was also formed the same year. The reduced cases of terrorism after cold war, led FBI to line up with the local police forces. They participated in tracking fugitives who had gone beyond state boundaries. FBI also used finger printing system to track criminals and also DNA testing (Keen, 32).
    As a conclusion, the September 11 attacks were a wakening ground for FBI operations. This occurred as a test to Mueller who had taken offer as the director three days prior to the attacks. He advocated for restructuring of FBI operations. Robert Mueller made tackling every federal crime a priority. The priorities included countering of terrorism, cyber security dangers and countering foreign intelligence threats.  Countering of crime was also a priority. Such crimes include white collar crime, violent crime, high technology crimes amongst other crimes committed against United States.